Baljeet & ORS v. State ( NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

$~41/42 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3680/2010 BALJEET & ORS , Petitioners Through : Mr. Karamveer Singh, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents Through : Mr. Sudershan Joon, APP AND + CRL.M.C. 3687/2016 BIRJU & ORS Petitioners Through ; Mr. Karamveer Singh, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents Through ; Mr. Sudershan Joon, APP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

o/o 30.09.2016 Crl. M.A. Nos. 15425/2016 15439/2016 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CRL.M.C. Nos. 3680/2016 & CRL.M.C. 3687/2016 By these petitions, petitioners have prayed for quashing of the Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

following cross FIRs:- (a) FIR No. 278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34 IPC registered at P.S. Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Sunita Gupta in Crl. M.C. No. 3687/2016.

(b) FIR No. 279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34 IPC registered at P.S. Pul Prahlad Pur on the complaint of respondent no. 2 Ms. Suman in Crl. M.C. No. 3680/2016.

Petitioners and private respondents in both the petitions belong to one family and are living in the same locality. A quarrel ensued between them, wherein both the parties sustained simple injuries. Allegations of molestation were also levelled by both the parties against each other. After the investigation, charge-sheets were filed and trial in both the cases are in progress. During the trial, parties were referred to Mediation Centre, wherein they have settled their disputes amicably on the terms and conditions recorded in the proceedings of the Mediation Centre on 25.1.2016. Both the parties want to maintain harmonious relation in future and have condoned their acts.

Keeping in mind that disputes arose between the members of same family and they have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, no

fruitful purpose would be served to keep them entangled in criminal cases. Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 278/2012 under Sections 451/323/354/509/34 IPG and FIR No. 279/2012 under Sections 323/341/354/509/34 IPG both registered at P.S. Pul Prahlad Pur and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed. Both the writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.lCnPATHAK, J.

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 rb