← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./4538/2018

Sudhir Kumar Sharma & ORS. v. State (Govt. Of NCT) Of Delhi & ANR.

2020-02-12Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri2 pages

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4538/2018 SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocate

Versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with ASI Sudarsanan S., PS - South Rohini Mr. S.V. Vats, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 1.

The present proceedings are instituted seeking quashing of FIR No. 210/2017 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. South Rohini, Delhi on the ground that parties have settled their disputes. 2.

Dr. M.P. Singh, learned APP for the State, submits that the charge sheet in the present case has been filed under aforesaid sections against the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only complainant/victim. 3.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that they have entered into a settlement out of Court. In terms of the settlement, the parties are living together and respondent No.2, is now, left with no claim whatsoever against petitioner.

4.

The petitioners, who are present in person, are identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer. Respondent No. 2, who is present in person, is identified by her counsel as well as the Investigating Officer. 5.

Respondent No. 2, who is present in Court, states that she has entered into the settlement agreement with her own free will, volition and without any coercion and she is living together with the petitioners since 2017. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

6.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

7.

The parties are bound by the statements made in Court today. 8.

In view of the above facts and since petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 are husband and wife and are now living together, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

9.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. 10.

Order dasti to the counsels for the parties.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 12, 2020 PB