Hari Prakash v. State (NCT Of Delhi) And ORS.

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12315/2018 & CM APPL. 47731/2018 HARI PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms.

Priya Shukla, Mr. Aveeraj Sharma and Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates Advocate for R-1 to 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 15.07.2025 1.

The petitioner has not entered appearance in this writ petition since 26.02.2020.

2.

By order dated 21.04.2025, Court notice was issued to him as well as his counsel. It was made clear that if the petitioner was unrepresented despite notice, it would be presumed that he was not interested in prosecuting this petition further.

3.

By order dated 21.05.2025, it was noted that Court notice had returned unserved qua learned counsel for the petitioner, but service upon the petitioner was awaited.

4.

The Registry now reports that service of Court notice upon the petitioner could also not be effected as the address was incomplete. 5.

In these circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for nonW.P.(C) 12315/2018 Page 1 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:38:14

prosecution.

6.

It is placed on record that, according to the instructions received by learned counsel for the respondents, the amounts claimed by the petitioner, in this writ petition, have been paid. 7.

All pending applications are also dismissed.

PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 15, 2025 SS/AD/ W.P.(C) 12315/2018 Page 2 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:38:14