Veena Baweja v. Puneet Kumar Goyal, Commissioner, South Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 443/2017, CM No. 21781/2019 VEENA BAWEJA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Counsel (appearance not given) versus PUNEET KUMAR GOYAL, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. for Mr.

Gaurang Kanth, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 20.08.2019 CM No. 21781/2019 (for delay) This is an application filed by the applicants / respondent nos. 1 and 2 seeking condonation of 32 days delay in filing the additional affidavit. For the reasons stated in the application delay of 32 days in filing the additional affidavit is condoned. Additional affidavit is taken on record. Application stands disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 443/2017 In view of the fact that the owner / occupier of the property in question has approached the ATMCD, which had stayed the demolition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to revive the same in the eventuality the appeal is dismissed and the respondent do not act in terms of the order passed by this court on December 9, 2016 in W.P.(C) 11582/2016

With liberty as prayed for the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J AUGUST 20, 2019/jg