Rahul @ Bhuri v. State

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2632/2018 RAHUL @ BHURI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Advocate.

(DHCLSC).

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC for State alongwith Ms. Suman Saharan, Advocate with SI Narender Singh, PS-Ambedkar Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 15.10.2018 The petitioner seeks parole for filing a Special Leave Petition in exercise of his constitutional right to seek acquittal against the conviction for which he is undergoing incarceration. The petitioner states that he will be the best person to choose, brief and assist a counsel to file and present his case before the Supreme Court. He also has to make arrangements of funds for the same. He is undergoing punishment of 7 years and 6 months, of which he has already undergone 5 years and 7 months and earned remission of 9 months 16 days.

Be that as it may, insofar as the petitioner seeks to exercise his constitutional right, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of

the Jail Superintendent concerned, subject to the following conditions:- (1) The petitioner shall report to the SHO, concerned Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi, once a week on every Tuesday during the period of parole.

(2) He shall furnish his telephone number to the SHO concerned, which the petitioner shall keep operational at all times. (3) He shall not leave the territory of NCT of Delhi. (4) The petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed-off. A copy of this order shall be supplied to the Jail Superintendent concerned through the police.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J OCTOBER 15, 2018 RW