Vijay Kumar Khanna v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-29, & ANR.

$~94 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 5649/2015 & CM 10171-10172/2015 VIJAY KUMAR KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Salil Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr Prakash Kumar, Mr Ravi Pratap Mall, Advs.

versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-29, & ANR ...... Respondents Through: Mr Rohit Madan, Adv.

Mr Hashmat Nabi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 27.05.2015 This writ petition concerns the notice dated 21.04.2015 issued under section 179(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the petitioner. The said notice required the petitioner to show cause as to why proceedings of recovery of the demand mentioned therein should not be initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner was required to submit his reply by 30.04.2015. The reply was submitted by the petitioner on 30.04.2015. However, till date the said show cause notice has not culminated in any order. Mr Madan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue submits that the order shall be passed within four weeks from today. We are also informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to this notice dated 21.04.2015, the TRO is also proceeding against the petitioner. We dispose of this writ petition by directing that the DCIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi, shall pass an order after considering the response given by the respondent within four weeks. Till such time the TRO shall not take any coercive measures.

Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J MAY 27, 2015 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J kb