Niyaz Mohd v. Pratap Singh Yadav

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 288/2017, CM APPL.NO.21187/2017 NIYAZ MOHD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Shoeb Shakeel and Mr.A.A.Ansari, Advs.

versus PRATAP SINGH YADAV ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.L.Sharma, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R

% 16.01.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not inclined to argue on merits provided the petitioner is allowed to remain in the premises for two years from now. Learned counsel for the respondent says in such a case let market rental be paid by the petitioner till the vacation of the premises. In the circumstances the petitioner to vacate the premises on 31.01.2021, and hand over its vacant and peaceful possession to the respondent. Also as an interim measure the petitioner to pay the respondent an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.08.2017 till 31.01.2021 as user/occupation charges. The arrears be cleared by two months and future payment be made on or before 7th of each calendar month. The water and

electricity charges be paid as per actuals. The usual undertaking to this effect shall be filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today. Any default in the payment of user/occupation charges shall entail eviction forthwith.

The petition along with pending application stands disposed of in terms of above.

Order dasti.

YOGESH KHANNA, J JANUARY 16, 2019 VLD