← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2644/2018

Anurag Singh & ANR. v. State NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

2019-01-11Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta2 pages

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2644/2018 ANURAG SINGH & ANR.

..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Ashwani Goel, Mr. Anil Goel, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Sachin, PS South Campus.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 11.01.2019 By the present petition the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 464/2014 under Sections 186/353/332/506/379/34 IPC registered at PS South Campus, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No. 2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instruction submits that pursuant to the investigation charge sheet has been filed against the two petitioners when the petitioners misbehaved with the doctor and the security guard on duty at the hospital and respondent No. 2 is the complainant/victim and respondent No. 3 the other victim. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who are present in Court and are identified by the Investigating Officer states that since the petitioners have compensated them and have assured that no such misbehaviour will take W.P.(CRL) 2644/2018

place in future they do not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Petitioners who are present in Court and are identified by the learned counsel affirm the statement of respondent Nos. 2 and 3. They also assure that no such misbehaviour will take place in future. To show remorse they undertake to deposit cost.

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No.

464/2014 under Sections 186/353/332/506/379/34 IPC registered at PS South Campus, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners depositing a cost of ₹25,000/- each with the Bar Council of Delhi Advocates Welfare Fund within four weeks.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JANUARY 11, 2019 'yo'

W.P.(CRL) 2644/2018