Rajeev Jain & Sons (Huf) v. Bhasin Infotech & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & ANR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 657/2016 RAJEEV JAIN & SONS (HUF) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate.

versus BHASIN INFOTECH & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sadhna Sharma, Advocate.

CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

O R D E R

% 02.02.2017

1. Learned counsel for the parties state that they are agreeable to the Court appointing a sole Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims.

2. The Court, accordingly, proposes Mr. M.L. Sahni, a former Additional District Judge (Mobile No. 9312235138) as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims. In the first instance, the proposed Arbitrator will make a disclosure in terms of Section 11 (8) read with Section 12 (1) of the Act and, thereafter, enter upon reference. In the event the disclosure is not made within a reasonable time or such disclosure discloses the inability of the proposed Arbitrator to act as such, it will be open to the parties to apply to this Court for directions. The proposed Arbitrator shall fix his own terms and communicate them to

the parties.

3. The parties are directed to appear before the proposed Arbitrator on 6th March, 2017 at 4:00 pm or such changed time and/or date that the proposed Arbitrator finds convenient which will be communicated to the parties at least ten days in advance. The venue for the first hearing will be arranged by the Petitioner and communicated to the proposed Arbitrator and the Respondent at least one week prior to the date fixed. The expenses for the hearing shall be equally shared by the parties.

4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. A certified copy of this order be delivered to the proposed Arbitrator forthwith. S.MURALIDHAR, J FEBRUARY 02, 2017 Rm