T.V. George v. Sandeep & ANR

$~44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 794/2018 and Crl. M.A. nos. 31972-73/2018 T.V. GEORGE ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satvik Varma and Mr. Kumar Sambhav, Advs.

versus SANDEEP & ANR ..... Respondents Through Counsel for the respondents (attendance slip not given)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 13.09.2018 Notice.

Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. By placing reliance on Ratan Lal vs. Prahlad Jat, (2017) 9 Supreme Court Cases, 340, learned counsel for the respondents contends that Revision Petition against the order passed on the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Revision Petition, in view of the objections taken by the respondents' counsel.

Revision petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 r.bararia