Jitender Kumar @ Jitu v. State

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1766/2017 & Crl.M.A.13818/2017 (early hearing) JITENDER KUMAR @ JITU .... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr.Dinesh Malik, proxy counsel for Mr.Imran Khan, Advocate versus STATE .... Respondent Represented by:

Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Virendra Kumar, PS Roop Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 13.12.2017 By this petition, the petitioner seeks furlough. Learned Additional Standing Counsel informs that after the filing of the present petition, the petitioner has already been granted furlough w.e.f. 25th October, 2017 for a period of three weeks by the competent authority. Thus, the present petition as well as application have become infructuous. Petition and the application for early hearing are dismissed as infructuous.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

DECEMBER 13, 2017 'rk'