High Court of DelhiFAO(OS) (COMM)/88/2016

Accure Labs Pvt Ltd v. Sugen Inc & ORS

2016-10-04Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Pratibha Rani1 pages

$~SB-1&2.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS)(COMM) 88/2016 ACCURE LABS PVT. LTD.

..... Appellant.

Through:

Mr. Utkarsh, Adv.

Versus

SUGEN INC. & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Rashi Punia, Adv.

AND FAO(OS)(COMM) 89/2016 SP ACCURE LABS PVT. LTD.

..... Appellant.

Through:

Mr. Utkarsh, Adv.

Versus

SUGEN INC. & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Rashi Punia, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 01.09.2017 Review Petition No.188/2017 & CMs No.17986/2017 (for stay), 17987/2017 (for condonation of delay of 9 days in re-filing) & 17988/2017 (for exemption) in FAO(OS)(COMM) No.88/2016 & Review Petition No.191/2017 & CMs No.18123/2017 (for stay), 18124/2017 (for condonation of delay of 9 days in re-filing) & 18125/2017 (for exemption) in FAO(OS)(COMM) No.89/2016 1.

The counsel for the review petitioner and the counsel for the opposite party appearing on advance notice have mentioned the matter. 2.

It is stated that Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate for the opposite party is unwell. 3.

List on 10th November, 2017.

The counsels agree that they will take in the proceedings for execution of the order imposing costs.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J PRATIBHA RANI, J SEPTEMBER 01, 2017 'pp/gsr'..