Monu Nayyar v. Jogdhan Hari Bhagwan Rastogi Charitble Memorable Trust

$~9 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 815/2018 and C.M.

Nos.39462/2018(stay) & 39463/2018(exemption) MONU NAYYAR ..... Appellant Through:

Dr.

Amit George, Advocate with appellant in person (M.

No.8280079686).

versus JOGDHAN HARI BHAGWAN RASTOGI CHARITBLE MEMORABLE TRUST ..... Respondent Through

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 26.09.2018 1.

This appeal as also the defence of the appellant/defendant/tenant is a gross abuse of process of law. The appellant/tenant is a tenant under a registered Lease Deed and such a person as the appellant has the gumption to take up a false case of having purchased the suit property by an oral transaction and by paying cash. The reality is that there is a registered Lease Deed dated 3.12.2010 and the monthly rent is Rs.14,000/- per month.

I am in fact surprised that the Delhi High Court legal Aid Services has provided a lawyer as a legal aid to such a person such

as the appellant.

2.

After hearing the arguments on behalf of the appellant, this Court was inclined to dismiss such type of frivolous appeal with costs of Rs.3 lacs payable to the www.bharatkeveer.gov.in besides registration of a criminal complaint against the appellant in exercise of powers under Section 340 Cr.P.C. read with Section 209 IPC for filing a false case but the appellant who is present in person instructs his counsel that the appeal be disposed of as not pressed. It is for this reason only that this Court is not dictating the detailed judgment.

3.

Appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 Ne