Rajiv Vaid v. Usha Mann & ORS

$-12 +

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 639/2015 RAJIV VAID Petitioner Through Mr. K.S.Pathaina, Advocate versus USHA MANN & ORS Through Respondent Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for Respondent No. 1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

ORDER

% 09.03.2016 Petitioneris aggrievedby the impugnedorder dated 30.04.2015 vide which the applicationfiled by defendant No.2 under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC seekingsettingaside of the ex-partejudgement and decree dated 27.04.2012 only qua defendant no. 2 is allowed. This is clear from the reading of the order itself No further orders are calledfor. Learnedcounselfor the petitionersseekspermissionofthis Courtto withdrawthis petition. Permission/isgranted. Dismissedas withdrawn.

Ir"

INDEl^EET KAUR, J MARCH 09, 2016 gb By:AMULYA