Atma Ram Bansal & ORS v. S Randhir Singh Chandhok

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EFA(OS) 25/2016 ATMA RAM BANSAL & ORS ..... Appellants Represented by:

Mr.Asutosh Lohia, Ms.Shradha, Ms.Soumya Kumar & Mr.Rahul Madhwani, Advocates.

versus S RANDHIR SINGH CHANDHOK ..... Respondent Represented by:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 07.10.2016 CM No.37743/2016 Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

EFA(OS) 25/2016 & CM No.37742/2016 1.

Since the impugned order directs attachment and is an ex-parte order, remedy available to the appellant is before the learned Single Judge challenging the attachment and sale of the property. 2.

Learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the appeal and the application because right before the learned Single Judge has to be exercised first.

3.

The appeal and the application are dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

No cost.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

OCTOBER 07, 2016/'hkaur'