Kapil Kumar v. State

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2087/2018 KAPIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Firoz Equbal Khan and Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 05.10.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was working with M/s Platinum Solutions whose proprietor was co-accused-Om Prakash Ray. Co-accused has already been granted bail. Petitioner is in custody for the past five and a half months. Charge-sheet has already been filed and trial is underway. Thus, it is prayed that petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned APP submits that co-accused Om Praksh Ray has been admitted to bail since he had paid `4 lacs to the complainant. She further submits that petitioner along with co-accused had duped the complainant's mother aged about 80 years to the tune of `39.47 lacs by alluring her that in case she invests money in LIC Pension Scheme she would get better returns. Accordingly, mother of the complainant had transferred money in the

accounts of Ravi Kumar, R.B. Solutions, PMT Services, Excel Investment, Friends Traders etc.

It is submitted that petitioner was working with coaccused Om Prakash Ray. Thus, petitioner is not entitled to bail. Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

OCTOBER 05, 2018 ga