Pramod Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority & ANR.

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5147/2017 & CM APPL. 21967/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for South Delhi Municipal Corporation with Mr.

Kamlesh Anand and Ms.

Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 11.01.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, and states that if advised the petitioner would file a fresh writ petition impugning the new notification. It is also prayed that all contentions and issues may be left open.

We take the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner on record and dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SANJIV KHANNA, J.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.

JANUARY 11, 2018 NC/MR