Naveen Gujjar v. State

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2079/2016 NAVEEN GUJJAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Jitendra Sethi and MrAmbar Tewari, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 21.12.2016 Crl.M.A.No.18501/2016 in BAIL APPLN. 2079/2016 This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of interim bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the only son left out in his family. Counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has received bullet injury on his person at the job. Counsel further submitted that the petitioner got treatment from LNJP hospital, Delhi. Counsel further submits that after the surgery on the person of the present petitioner, the condition of the inmate has gone down. Counsel has further submitted that the mother of the petitioner has gone to meet the petitioner in jail where she found that the condition of her only son left out is very precarious.

Counsel further submits that while having discussion of the petitioner with his mother, the inmate has stated that he fell down in the bathroom.

that the petitioner may be released on interim bail for a period of two months.

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the bail application and submitted that as per the jail report, the condition of the petitioner is stable and satisfactory and the petitioner is a desperate criminal. I have gone through the affidavit filed by the mother of the petitioner on record and her submission that the petitioner is the only son left out in the family.

In these circumstances, I admit the petitioner on interim bail for a period of one month from the date of his release, on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court with the condition that he shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned Court and shall not meet the complainant or his family members till the next date of hearing and he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. On the expiry of the interim bail period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent concerned forthwith, who shall submit a report to this effect. Application stands disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order be given dasti to the parties and a copy thereof be also sent to the Jail Superintendent concerned forthwith for information and compliance.

I.S.MEHTA, J DECEMBER 21, 2016/'dc'