← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2378/2017

Pradeep Kumar & ANR v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

2017-12-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2378/2017 PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.

along with petitioner no.1 in person.

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Manoj, P.S. Mundka.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 15.12.2017 It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 is nephew of respondent no.2; whereas petitioner no.2 is wife of petitioner no.1. A quarrel ensued between them on some trivial issue which led to the incident resulting registration of FIR No. 126/2017 under Sections 325/506/34 IPC at police station Mundka, on the complaint of respondent no.2. It is further submitted that petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, aforesaid FIR may be quashed.

Respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Manoj of police station Mundka. She submits that she has settled the matter with the petitioners of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion, therefore, she is not interested in pursuing the FIR and

the same may be quashed.

Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR, which is at the investigation stage, are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

DECEMBER 15, 2017 ga