Om Dutt Gautam v. State

$~31 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2128/2018 and Crl. M.A. 31879/2018 OM DUTT GAUTAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dharmender Basoya, Advocate with petitioner in person versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Neeraj Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 12.09.2018 After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner tendered apology for withholding the crucial facts from the pleadings and his submission, despite knowledge that earlier non-bailable warrants followed by process under Section 82 Cr. PC had been issued against the petitioner by the court of the jurisdictional Magistrate and further that inspite of direction to join investigation by the court of Sessions, the petitioner had failed to abide by the same and instead suffered the first anticipatory bail application to be dismissed in default on 06.11.2017. He now seeks permission, on instructions, to withdraw the present petition and the application filed therewith undertaking that the petitioner would present himself before the investigating BAIL APPLN. 2128/2018

officer.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

The petitioner is bound by the undertaking.

R.K.GAUBA, J SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 yg BAIL APPLN. 2128/2018