High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1085/2017

Abhinav Kohli v. The State

2017-09-20Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1085/2017 ABHINAV KOHLI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Atin Chadha and Mr.Siddhant Sethia, Advocates.

versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Sudhir Rathi, P.S. Subhash Place, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 20.09.2017 This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.600/2016, under Section 307/34 IPC and Sections 27/54/59 Arms Act registered at Police Station Subhash Place, Delhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is anticipating arrest from the officials of Police Station Subhash Place, Delhi in case FIR No.600/2016, under Section 307/34 IPC and Sections 27/54/59 Arms Act. Counsel further submits that there is no evidence qua against the present petitioner and the petitioner has already joined the investigation and he is further ready to join the investigation as and when directed. Counsel further submits that the injured has already been discharged from the

hospital and nothing is to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner and prays that the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail. Learned APP for the State, on instructions from the IO submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation. However, he opposes the present bail application and submits that the present petitioner has refused to participate in the TIP proceedings.

Looking in to the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to join further investigation as and when directed and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the IO/SHO concerned with the condition that he shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned Court; he shall not extend threat to the injured/victim and he shall not contact the injured/victim in any manner and he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

The present bail application is allowed and stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 'dc'