Ramesh Yadav & ORS v. State (Gnct Of Delhi) & ORS

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2458/2017 RAMESH YADAV & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Tarun Bhardwaj, Advocate with five petitioners in person.

versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP for State with SI Mahesh Kumar, PS Nangloi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 12.10.2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.167/2014 under Sections 323/341/354A/34 IPC registered at Police Station-Nangloi, District West, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that a compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties in the matter. Respondents No.2 to 6 are present in Court today. They have been identified by the Investigating Officer. They state that they have settled the matter with the petitioners with their own free will and choice without any threat, pressure and coercion as per Compromise Deed dated 28.04.2017. They further submit that they do not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and of their own free will and without any coercion, CRL.M.C. 2458/2017

pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.167/2014 under Sections 323/341/354A/34 IPC registered at Police Station-Nangloi, District West, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J OCTOBER 12, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 2458/2017