High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/7051/2015

Muzibur Rahman v. Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) And ANR.

2016-03-03Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra2 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7051/2015 MUZIBUR RAHMAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.

Divya Jyoti Jaipuriar and Mr.Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Advocates.

versus CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Amit Narayan, Advocate for R-1.

Mr. Sahil Monga, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA

O R D E R

% 03.03.2016 At the outset and without going into the merits, counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if respondent No. 1- Chief Labour Commissioner, Central, Government of India, were to dispose off his representation dated 16th January, 2015 by a reasoned order whilst also treating the instant writ petition as a part of that representation in a time bound manner.

Counsel for respondent No.1is also agreeable to this. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No. 1 to dispose off the aforesaid representation by speaking order within eight weeks from today, W.P.(C) 7051/2015

whilst reserving the right of the petitioner to approach any appropriate forum available to him in law in case he remains dissatisfied with the outcome of the same. Furthermore, in view of certain objections that have been taken by the respondents with regard to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the matter, it is made clear that this order shall not by itself amount to conceding the jurisdiction of this Court with regard to any grievance that the petitioner may have with any order that may be passed by respondent No.1. All such aspects are left open. Furthermore, by this order, no special jurisdiction is being conferred on the Chief Labour Commissioner in addition to or apart from the existing jurisdiction under the relevant statue and rules, etc. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. It is made clear that the merits of the matter have not been examined one way or the other.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J MARCH 03, 2016 AK W.P.(C) 7051/2015