Jai Prakash Singh v. Bses Yamuna Power Ltd And ANR

#23 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9815/2016 & CM APPL. 39092/2016 JAI PRAKASH SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, Advocate versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R-1.

Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 29.11.2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner states that he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is treated as a representation addressed to respondent no. 1-BSES YPL and is decided by its General Manager (Human Resources).

Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, learned counsel for respondent no. 1-BSES YPL has no objection to the same.

Consequently, present writ petition is directed to be treated as a representation to be decided by the General Manager (Human Resources) of respondent no. 1-BSES YPL as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks. A copy of reasoned order shall be communicated to the petitioner by registered AD post within a week thereafter.

With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition and application stands disposed of.

MANMOHAN, J NOVEMBER 29, 2016 rn