Dev Kumar v. New Delhi Municipal Council & ORS

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9433/2016 DEV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Advocate.

versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.

Mananjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate for NDMC.

Mr.Siddhartha Shanker Ray, Advocate for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 19.10.2016 C.M. Nos.37757-58/2016 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Applications disposed of.

W.P.(C) 9433/2016 & C.M. No.37759/2016 Petitioner is stated to be vending at near shop no.36, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi. In support of his stand he has filed certain challans of the year 2011. His further submission is that he is protected under Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent/New Delhi

Municipal Council who has put in appearance on advance notice submits that these challans do not create any vested rights in favour of the petitioner. He admits that Town Vending Committee (TVC) of respondent no.1 has since been constituted.

Be that as it may, since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) of respondent no.1 has been constituted. Petitioner is granted liberty to approach the said TVC to get addressed his grievances, if any. Petition disposed of in the above terms.

Order dasti.

INDERMEET KAUR, J OCTOBER 19, 2016 ndn