Amit Kumar v. Union Of India & ANR

$32 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5706/2015 AMIT KUMAR . Petitioner Through:

Mr M. Dutta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents Through:

Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent No. 1 Mr Sanjay Kumar, SSO/Legal for DMRC + W.P.(C) 5707/2015 f It VIJAY KUMAR Petitioner Through:

Mr M. Dutta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents Through:

Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent No. 1 Mr Sanjay Kumar, SSO/Legal for DMRC + W.P.(C) 57 10/2015 JAGDISH KUMAR ARORA (NOW DECEASED) (THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS) Petitioner Through:

Mr M. Dutta, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents Through:

Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for Respondent No. 1 Mr Sanjay Kumar, SSO/Legal for DMRC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA By:AMULYA

ORDER

% 16.10.2015 The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions. He requests that the reference court may be directed to decide the Section 18 reference pending before it at an early date. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

We hope that the reference court shall dispose of Section 18 reference as expeditiously as possible, in as much as, the acquisition is of the year 2006 and possession whereof was taken over in 2006 itself. AR DURREZ AHMED, J t AEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 16, 2015 rs