Sh. Bhim Singh @ Bhim Sain v. The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi)
$~2&3.
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 2131/2018 SH. BRIM SINGH @ BRIM SAIN Petitioner Through:
Mr. Girish Chaudhary, Adv.
versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Santosh Kumar, PS Pandav Nagar.
+ BAIL APPLN. 2133/2018 SMT. VEER BALA Petitioner Through:
Mr. Girish Chaudhary, Adv.
versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Santosh Kumar, PS Pandav Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
ORDER
% 02.11.2018 Allegations about involvement of both the petitioners in the offence under Section 420 IPC which is subject matter of investigation of FIR no. 244/2018 of police station Pandav Nagar has been lodged, in the wake of which the petitioners apprehending arrest have approached this Court by the present petitions for anticipatory bail.
Page I of 3 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
On 13.09.2018, petitioner Bhim Singh @ Bhim Sain has submitted through counsel that he is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 70,000/- in the form of fixed deposit receipt in the name of the complainant with the jurisdictional Magistrate and for this purpose time of two weeks was sought, it being shown that as per the FIR, the amount of which complainant had been cheated was in the sum of Rs. 69,250/-. The petitioner Bhim Singh @ Bhim Sain has submitted an affidavit by Crl.M.A. 35813/2018, the other petitioner Veer Bala, wife of the first mentioned petitioner also having furnished a similar affidavit by Crl. M.A. 35812/2018 confirming that fixed deposit receipt, as aforesaid, has been deposited with the Metropolitan Magistrate.
In the given facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed, it is directed that in the event of petitioners Bhim Singh @ Bhim Sain & Veer Bala being arrested, they shall be released subject to confirmation by the investigating officer from the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate about the deposit of the afore-mentioned FIR, on bail by the arresting officer, on each of them furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the following further conditions :- (i) The petitioners shall continue cooperating with the investigation and join the same as and when called upon to do so; (ii) The petitioners shall not come in contact with or try to influence any of the witnesses connected to the case; (iii) Prior to their release, they shall give the telephone numbers of self and of at least one other responsible family member besides that
of the surety to the investigating officer;
(iv) They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; This order will inure only till the date of first appearance of the petitioners in the event of a charge-sheet being filed on conclusion of the investigation and process being issued against them by the court of cognizance.
The petitions stand disposed of in above terms. Dasti under the signatures of Court Master.
'
.1 R.K.GAUBA, J NOVEMBER 02,2018 nk