Sanjeev Kumar And Others v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4858/2018 SANJEEV KUMAR AND OTHERS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. P.K. Srivastava, Adv.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Ashok Kumar, P.S. Sagarpur.

Respondent nos.2 and 3 are present in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 15.10.2018 It is submitted that petitioner no.1 is cousin; whereas petitioner no.2 is aunt of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Petitioner no. 3 is neighbour of petitioner nos. 1 and 2.

Petitioners and respondent nos. 2 and 3 have settled their disputes amicably vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 07.03.2018, therefore, FIR No.

691/2015 under Sections 323/354-A(1)(i)/354-C/354D/506/509/120B/34 IPC read with Section 12 of the POCSO Act and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom may be quashed.

Respondent nos.2 and 3 are present in Court and have been identified by SI Ashok Kumar of police station Sagarpur. They submit that they have settled the matter with petitioners of their own free will and without

any undue force, pressure or coercion, therefore, they have no objection in case aforesaid FIR is quashed.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 and 3 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

OCTOBER 15, 2018 ga