High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3074/2016
Bunty @ Rajiv v. State
2016-11-28Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi1 pages
$~5.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3074/2016 BUNTY @ RAJIV ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Nikhil Pillai & Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocates.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel and Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate along with SI Narender Kumar, PSPrasad Nagar, for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R
% 28.11.2016 The nominal roll placed on record shows that the petitioner was granted parole for a period of two weeks with effect from 11.11.2016 and was due to surrender on 26.11.2016.
Mr. Mehra submits that the petitioner has duly surrendered. In view of the aforesaid position, this petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as such.
VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 28, 2016 B.S. Rohella