Vijay Kumar & ORS v. Union Of India & ANR

$~28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10050/2016 & CM No. 39844/2016 VIJAY KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.G. Tushar Rao with Mr.Mayank Sharma & Mr.Vinod Sharma, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC & Mr.Naginder Benipal, Adv. for R-1 & 2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 25.10.2016 CM No. 39844/2016 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 10050/2016 After hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to treat the writ petition as a representation of the petitioner seeking absorption and to take a decision on the representation in accordance with law within six weeks.

The petitioner may file an affidavit giving further and better

particulars of his claim to absorption as required by the respondent No.2. It is made clear that the time frame for consideration of the representation is mandatory.

Dasti.

INDIRA BANERJEE, J JAYANT NATH, J OCTOBER 25, 2016 gm