← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10347/2016

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Gyan Prakash

2016-11-07Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sunita Gupta,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna2 pages

$^43 -44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10347/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Petitioner Through Mr Anshuj Dhingra and Mr Harbhajan Singh, Advs.

versus GYANPRAKASH Respondent Through Mr T.D. Yadav, Adv.

+ W.P.(C) 10348/2016 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Petitioner Through Mr Anshuj Dhingra and Mr Harbhajan Singh, Advs.

versus KESHA RAM Respondent Through Mr-T.D. Yadav, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE SANHV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA

ORDER

% 07.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner corporation, on instructions, states that the corporation is agreeable to the following: (i) The corporation will permit the respondents to join India Trade Promotion Organization (ITPO).

(ii) The respondents would be entitled to retain their lien with the Delhi Transport Corporation for a period of one year and on or before the said date, the respondents would submit their technical resignations. (iii) Cyan Prakash (respondent in W.P.(C) No.10347/2016 is in occupation of staff quarter. He shall vacate the staff quarter within Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

one month from the date he joins ITPO on deputation. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, states that condition no.(iii) is acceptable to Gyan Prakash. With regard to condition no. (ii), it is submitted that the period of probation has not been specified by the ITPO. Learned counsel for the respondents states that in case ITPO want to extend' the period of probation beyond one year, the respondents will approach the petitioner corporation for appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the petitioner corporation on instructions from Mr S. Chandra, Depot Manager, has accepted the said suggestion. In view of and recording the aforesaid statement, the writ petitions are disposed of.

The petitioner corporation would issue necessary orders / papers within a period of one week from today.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that in view of the order passed today, he would not press the contempt petitions. The counsel for the respondents will file a copy of this order with the ITPO. SANJIV KHANNA, J WvSUNITA GUPTA, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016/rrf