← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10225/2016

Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. v. Union Of India & ANR

2016-11-07Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 10225/2016 && CM No. 40355-40356/2016 JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Devashish Bharuka and Mr. Ravi Bharuka, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Sanjiv Narula, CGSC with Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Shreshtha Jain, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 07.11.2016 The petitioner by the present petition seeks disbursement of an amount of Rs. 8, 36,48,510/- allegedly towards the Net Present Value (NPV) of the amount spent by the petitioner for obtaining forest clearances for Moitra Coal block allotted to the petitioner. It is contended that in addition to other amounts, the petitioner is also entitled to the said amount.

Learned ASG appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the petitioner has not given any representation claiming amount under the said head and if any such representation is made by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law and in case any amount is found to be legally payable the same would be paid to the petitioner.

W.P.(C) 10225/2016

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a representation was made on 10.05.2016, however, a fresh composite representation inter alia also seeking the above amount would be made within a period of one week.

In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to the competent authority within a period of one week along with all supporting documents and annexures. On such a representation being made, the respondent/competent authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms, reserving liberty of the petitioner to take such remedies as may be available in law, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any decision of the respondent.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016 'rs'

W.P.(C) 10225/2016