Anshuman v. State

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1139/2017 ANSHUMAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP for State with SI Nipender, ASI Nasir Abbas, P.S. Madhu Vihar Mr. Zafar Abbas and Mr. Sanjiv Arora, Advocates for complainant

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

O R D E R

% 13.06.2017 Crl.M.A.No. 9953/2017 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Bail Appln.No. 1139/2017

2. This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 435/2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S Madhu Vihar.

3. The Court has heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and has also examined the FIR.

BAIL APPLN. 1139/2017 Page 1 of 2.

4. Counsel for the Petitioner referred to the documents pertaining to the earlier complaint which ultimately got withdrawn when the parties reached a settlement. He also referred to the order dated 7th November 2013 passed by this Court in Crl.M.C.No.4200/2013 recording the settlement.

5. However, the present FIR adverts to the events that took place thereafter. A perusal of the FIR reveals that there are sufficient and grave allegations against the Petitioner which require to be investigated. There is no case made out for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. The petition is dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR (Vacation Judge) JUNE 13, 2017 mw BAIL APPLN. 1139/2017 Page 2 of 2.