← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10246/2016

Banbhat Private Iti v. Union Of India & ORS

2017-05-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao3 pages

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10246/2016, CM No. 40439/2016 BANBHAT PRIVATE ITI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. with Mr.

Vidit Monga, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Farman Ali, Adv. with Mr. M.C.

Kardam, Adv. for R-4

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 23.05.2017 1.

On the last date of hearing, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that BCC related documents have been submitted with the respondent no. 4 on 27th April, 2017, however, no response has been received as yet. It is further submitted that name of the petitioner has not been uploaded by the respondent no. 4 on its web portal maintained by it for recognised institutes, inasmuch as, user ID and password has also not been provided to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 seeks time to take instructions.

Renotify on 23rd May, 2017."

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes three submissions; (i) On the BCC related documents, which have been submitted by the petitioner with the respondent No.4 on April 27, 2017, no response has been received; (ii) the name of the petitioner has not been uploaded by the respondent No.1 on its web portal maintained by it for recognized Institutes nor User ID, password has been provided; (iii) the name of the petitioner needs to be uploaded before the admission process is started. 3.

Insofar as submission (i) is concerned, Mr. Farman Ali, on instructions from Mr. M.C. Kardam, Joint Director of respondent No.4 would submit that the BCC related documents shall be placed before the NCVT Committee for their decision. He also states, if any deficiencies are found in the BCC related documents, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner for removing the said deficiencies. 4.

Insofar as submission (ii) is concerned, it is stated that the same shall be uploaded within two months.

5.

Insofar as submission (iii) is concerned, he states that the admission process shall not start before the expiry of two months from today. The aforesaid statements are taken on record. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent No.4, learned counsel for the

petitioner states, nothing survives in the writ petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, as such.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MAY 23, 2017/ak