High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./4209/2016

Vikas Kumar @ Vicky & ORS. v. State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

2017-04-12Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S.P.Garg3 pages

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4209/2016 VIKAS KUMAR @ VICKY & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through :

Mr.Amit Kumar with Ms.Meenakshi Dutta, Advocates along with petitioners present in person.

versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

..... Respondents Through :

Ms.Anita Abraham, APP.

Complainant present with her father.

SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 12.04.2017 (1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.239/2011 under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/victim amicably. (2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court along with her father.

The Investigating Officer present in the court has identified her.

I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioners amicably without fear and CRL.M.C. 4209/2016

pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. It is informed that pursuant to the settlement `50,000/- by way of cheque bearing No.852036 dated 12.4.2017, drawn on State Bank of India and a sum of `50,000/- in cash have been handed over to the complainant today in the court. Statement of the complainant recorded separately. Divorce by mutual consent has been granted. (3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties. Settlement deed dated 25.06.2012 signed by the parties is on record. (4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.239/2011 under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

(5) The petition is disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J.

APRIL 12, 2017/sa CRL.M.C. 4209/2016

Crl.M.C.4209/2016 Statement of Respondent No.2-Priya Gautam, D/o Saudan Singh Gautam, R/O H.No.593, Gali No.7, Haiderpur on S.A. I have settled the disputes with the petitioners amicably before Rohini Courts, Delhi. Pursuant to the settlement, I have received `50,000/- by way of cheque bearing No.852036 dated 12.4.2017, drawn on State Bank of India and a sum of `50,000/- in cash today in the court. I have no objection to the quashing of the FIR No.239/2011 under Sections 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri and all the proceedings emanating therefrom. R.O. & A.C.

12.04.2017 S.P.GARG (JUDGE)