Jankiji Mangal Udyog v. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5480/2017 JANKIJI MANGAL UDYOG .....

Petitioner Through:Mr. S.K. Khurana, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR...... Respondent Through:Mr. Arun K. Sharma and Mr. Iram Majid, Advocates

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 04.07.2017 CM 23031/2017 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 5480/2017

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by Mr Arun K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Respondents that if time timebound directions are issued the Respondents will process the refund claim of the Petitioner in compliance therewith.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that for the period for which refund is sought, the assessment proceedings have been completed and even the 'C' Forms have been furnished.

W.P.(C) 5480/2017

5. In that view of the matter, it is directed that in case the VATO requires the Petitioner to furnish photocopies of the 'C' Form, he will write to the Petitioner in that regard not later than one week from today. The Petitoner will in such event furnish the requisite information/document within one week thereafter.

6. Subject to the above, it is directed that the refund order for the above period be issued not later than four weeks from today and the refund amount together with the interest due thereon be deposited into the account of the Petitioner directly not later than one week thereafter.

7. In case of any non-compliance with the above directions, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

8. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

9. Order Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J JULY 04, 2017 rd W.P.(C) 5480/2017