Arvind Kumar v. State

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3274/2016 ARVIND KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. B.K. Patra and Mr. Imran Khan, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :Ms.

Kamna Vohra, ASC with Inspector Karamvir Singh, P.S. I.P.

Estate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.02.2017 Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that petitioner's wife used to stand surety for him. Now, she states that she is ready to furnish surety for the petitioner.

I am not inclined to modify the conditions as contained in the impugned order.

Writ petition is dismissed.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 10, 2017 rb