Manoj Sirhoi v. State

$~70.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3275/2016 MANOJ SIRHOI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Ms. Anya Singh and Ms. Megha Bahl, Adv for State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 06.03.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 3787/2017 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed while granting him parole vide order dated 16.01.2017. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is not in a position to provide a local surety as required by this court. Instead, he states that his wife is ready and willing to stand as surety for him. Let the petitioner's wife remain present in court on the next date. List on 15.03.2017.

VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 06, 2017 sr