Hpcl-Mittal Energy Limited v. Artson Engineering Ltd.

$~4, 5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 686/2018 & I.A. 12444/2018 HPCL-MITTAL ENERGY LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kartik Nayar and Mr. Sarthak Malhotra, Advs.

versus ARTSON ENGINEERING LTD.

..... Respondent Through Mr. E.R. Kumar, Ms. Smita Bhargava, Ms. Aishwarya Dash, Ms.

Sumedha Sindhu and Mr. Manu Bajaj, Advs.

AND + ARB.P. 687/2018 & I.A. 12445/2018 HPCL-MITTAL ENERGY LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kartik Nayar and Mr. Sarthak Malhotra, Advs.

versus ARTSON ENGINEERING LTD.

..... Respondent Through Mr.

E.R.

Kumar, Ms.

Smita Bhargava, Ms. Aishwarya Dash, Ms.

Sumedha Sindhu and Mr. Manu Bajaj, Advs.

AND + ARB.P. 688/2018& I.A. 12446/2018 HPCL-MITTAL ENERGY LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Kartik Nayar and Mr. Sarthak Malhotra, Advs.

versus ARTSON ENGINEERING LTD.

..... Respondent ARB.P. 686/2018 & Conn.

Through Mr.

E.R.

Kumar, Ms.

Smita Bhargava, Ms. Aishwarya Dash, Ms.

Sumedha Sindhu and Mr. Manu Bajaj, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R D E R

% 11.10.2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that he has instructions not to press the captioned petition as an Arbitrator has already been appointed. 2.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. 3.

Pending application shall stand disposed of being rendered infructuous.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J OCTOBER 11, 2018 rb ARB.P. 686/2018 & Conn.