Smt Seema Sharma v. State (Govt Of NCT Delhi)

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2170/2018 SMT SEEMA SHARMA Petitioner

Versus

STATE (GOVT OF NOT DELHI) Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 2175/2018 DINESFI KUMAR SHARMA Petitioner

Versus

STATE (GOVT OF NOT DELHI) Respondent Through:

Mr. Naman Raj Thakur and Mr. Punit Budhiraja, Advocates for Petitioners.

Mr. Raj at Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Gaurav, P.S.

Vivek Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

ORDER

% 13.11.2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Us has been amicably settled by way of a Settlement/Agreement dated 22.09.2018, courtesy the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The said document is on record. The petitioners have undertaken to pay an amount of Rs. 15.50 lacs in tenns of the schedule mentioned in para 5(b) of the said Settlement/Agreement. In pursuance thereof, a cheque of Rs.25,000/-, dated 15.10.2018 has already been paid to the complainant. / In view of the above, the interim order dated 17.09.2018 is confirmed. An affidavit of undertaking shall be filed by the petitioners within a period of one week to the effect that the said Agreement shall be duly honoured by them.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they will be moving a joint application in terms of the aforesaid Settlement seeking quashing of the FIR. However, in case of default apropos any of aforesaid scheduled payment, it will be open for the Investigating Officer and the complainant to approach the Court for directions. The petition stands disposed-off in terms of the above. i NAJhM WAZIRI, J.

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 sb