Sh. Jagpal @ Raj Kumar & ANR. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS.

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5287/2018 SH. JAGPAL @ RAJ KUMAR & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepankar Kataria, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Vijay Pal Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate with Ms. Shivani Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 31.01.2020 1.

The present proceedings are instituted seeking quashing of FIR No.6/2015 under Section 363 IPC registered at Police Station Sector-23, Dwarka, Delhi on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes. 2.

Learned APP for the State submits that the charge-sheet has been filed only under Section 363 IPC. It is stated that during the investigation, it was verified that petitioner No. 2 was 19 years of age at the time of MLC. 3.

As per the prosecution case, the present FIR has been filed by respondent Nos.2 & 3 against the present petitioners who are their son-in-law and daughter.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that they have entered an out of Court settlement. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 & petitioner No. 2 got married on 08.01.2015 and since then they are living together and have been blessed with a child. In terms of the CRL.M.C. 5287/2018

settlement, respondent Nos.2 & 3, are now, left with no claim whatsoever against the petitioners.

5.

The petitioners and respondent Nos. 2 & 3, who are present in person, are identified by their respective counsel and the Investigating Officer. 6.

Respondent Nos. 2 & 3, who are present in Court, states that they have entered into a settlement with their own free will, volition and without any coercion. They further state that they have no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties are bound by the statements made in Court today. 9.

In view of the above and the fact that the parties have amicably settled their disputes, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the criminal proceedings against the petitioners. It is accordingly directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. 11.

Order dasti to the counsels for the parties.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JANUARY 31, 2020/p'ma CRL.M.C. 5287/2018