Madan Singh v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

$~84 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2693/2017 & Crl. M.A. no. 11173/2017 MADAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through :Mr. R.P. Pandey and Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advs.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

..... Respondents Through : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State Mr.

Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr.

Arnav, Mr.

Vidyarthi and Ms. Anju Thomas, Advs. for respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 18.07.2017 Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. admits that matter has been settled with the petitioner Shri Madan Singh, inasmuch as settled amount has already been paid by the petitioner to the respondent no. 2. It is further submitted that he has no objection in case FIR No. 1019/2014 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amend), 2003 registered at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area is quashed, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and

respondent no. 2, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 1019/2014 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act (Amend), 2003 registered at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JULY 18, 2017 rb