← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/10852/2016

M/S Munshi Ram Ram Parkash v. Commissioner Of Delhi Value Added Tax & ANR.

2016-12-17Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri2 pages

* ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10808/2016 ^ M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH J ^° Through; Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surinder Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Ms. Ruchi Babbar, Ms. Amita Babbar, Mr. Bharat Tripathi and Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX Through; Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC and Mr. R.K. r Iyer, Advs.

Mr. Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel, GNC1U + W.P.(C) 10852/2016 ^ ^ M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PARKASH ••••• PetiUone Through: Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surinder Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Ms. Ruchi Babbar, Ms. Amita Babbar, Mr. Bharat Tripathi and Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Advs.

versus ^ COMMISSIONER OF DELHI V ALUE ADDED TAX & Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC and Mr. R.K. Iyer, Advs.

Mr Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel, GNCIU ^ * SSSrampakkash Through: Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surmdei Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Ms. Ruchi Babbar, Ms. Amita Babbar, Mr. Bharat Tripathi and Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX Through: Mr. Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel, GNCTD + W.P.(C) 11064/2016 By:AMULYA

cS M/S LUDHIANA AUTO SUPPLY CO.

••••• Petitioner Through; Mr. A.K. Babbar, Mr. Surinder Kumar, Mr. Atul Babbar, Ms. Ruchi Babbar, Ms. Amita Babbar, Mr. Bharat Tripathi and Mr. Pramod Kr. Jain, Advs.

versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX & ANR.

Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, Addl. Standing Counsel, GNCTD Mr Anug Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms.

Deboshree Mukherjee, Adv.

C'

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI

ORDER

o/o 17.12.2016 It is brought to the notice of the Court that in these cases, the refunds have been claimed with respect to the periods prior to the insertion of Section 38(7)(d) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - which is brought into force from 18.06.1992. In these circumstances, the respondents shall ensure that the refund orders along with up to date interest are made and the amounts are remitted to the petitioners' accounts within 10 days. Disputes with respect to discrepancies, if any, shall be subject to applications by the petitioners which shall be disposed off within a month of their receipt. The writ petitions are disposed off in terms of these directions. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J DECEMBER 17,2016/acm NA»I WAZIRI, J