Raj Kumar Aggarwal v. State

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2352/2016 & Crl. M.A 17922/2016 RAJ KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State S.I. Rakesh Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 10.07.2017 This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.363/2016, under Sections 342/354/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station- Mianwali Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person having no nexus with the present FIR. He further submits that the allegations levelled in the present FIR are false. He also submits that nothing is to be recovered at the instance of the present petitioner. He prays that the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned APP for the State on instructions from the IO submits that the prosecution would be filing charge-sheet without arrest. Heard.

Perused.

Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is

directed to join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO concerned with the condition that he shall not influence the prosecution witnesses; he shall not tamper the prosecution evidence; he shall not indulge in any illegal activities; he shall not leave India without prior permission of the concerned Court.

The present bail application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J JULY 10, 2017/km