Atul Dikshit v. C B I

$~37 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4296/2016 & Crl.M.A.Nos.17895-96/2016 ATUL DIKSHIT ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr.Kumar Vaibhav and Mr.Ramaditya Tiwari, Advocates.

versus C B I ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms.Garima Singh Yadav and Ms.Kriti Handa, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 17.11.2016 1.

Apprehension of the petitioner is that the questions to be put to the witness have already been asked in his earlier examination. 2.

Trial Court shall ensure that questions already asked are not repeated at the time of examination of the witness recalled. 3.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above observations.

4.

All pending application(s) also stand disposed of. 5.

Order dasti.

S.P.GARG, J.

NOVEMBER 17, 2016/sa