Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-I New Delhi v. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt.Ltd.

$~26 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ITA 844/2016 & CM No. 43731/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roychoudhuri, Adv.

versus PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT.LTD.

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 25.11.2016 The question of law urged is with respect to the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax, 1961.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in the assessee's favour concluding that the application of Rule 8D was unwarranted given that the proviso did not exist in the assessment year i.e. AY 2006-07. The Court relied upon the ruling in Maxopp Investments Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax 347 ITR 272.

No question of law arises. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J NOVEMBER 25, 2016/kk