Sterlite Technologies Limited v. Bharat Broadband Network Ltd.

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 726/2018 STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishi Raj & Ms. Kavita Singh, Advs versus BHARAT BROADBAND NETWORK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Prasad, proxy counsel for Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Adv File received from the Court of Sh Sharad Gupta (DHJS) Joint Registrar (Judicial).

CORAM:

SH. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 07.01.2019 IA No. 24/2019 (u/S 151 CPC filed by respondent for taking on record reply to Arbitration Petition No. 726/2018) Notice of IA accepted by counsel for petitioner, who has no objection, if delay in filing reply to Arbitration Petition No. 726/2018 is condoned and reply is taken on record, subject to costs. For the reasons stated in the application and submissions advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, delay in filing of reply to the Arbitration Petition is condoned, in the interest of justice, subject to payment of cost of Rs 2,500/- to counsel for petitioner. Reply to Arbitration Petition No. 726/2018 filed by respondent is directed to be taken on record, subject to payment of cost to counsel

for petitioner.

IA stands disposed of accordingly.

ARB.P. 726/2018 As prayed, list the matter before Hon'ble Court on the date already fixed in the case i.e. on 14.01.2019. RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) JANUARY 07, 2019 sk