Amit Beniwal v. State

$~17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2363/2016 AMIT BENIWAL ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms.Geetika Sharma, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Arun K.Sharma, APP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 09.02.2017 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.1333/2015 registered under Sections 354A/506/509/341/34 IPC at PS Vijay Vihar. Status report not filed. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 21.11.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then.

The complainant was permitted to file response.

The complainant failed to avail the opportunity. Today, none has appeared on behalf of the complainant to contest the bail application. The petitioner and the prosecutrix were acquainted with each other for about 3 or 4 years prior to the incident. Monetary transactions had taken place between the two. Number of persons have been involved by the complainant in the FIR. BAIL APPLN. 2363/2016

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J FEBRUARY 09, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 2363/2016