Dr Jalaluddin v. Jamaluddin & ORS

$~18 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 1234/2016 & CM No. 44357/2016 DR JALALUDDIN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Dhruv Rajpoot, Adv.

versus JAMALUDDIN & ORS ..... Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

SH. RAVINDER SINGH (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 11.03.2019 CM NO. 11253/2019 (U/O V Rule 20 CPC for substitution service of notice upon R-2) By this application appellant wants to serve the notice of this petition and applications upon respondent no. 2 by substitution mode. It is stated in this application that notice was sent to the R-2 which was received back unserved with endorsement "not residing". Further, it is stated that new address of the respondent no. 2 is not available petitioner hence, petitioner is not in a position to serve the notice and therefore, it is just proper to serve R-2 through substituted service in local newspaper. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused this application, I am satisfied that the R-2 cannot be served by ordinary means. Therefore, this application is allowed. It is directed that the R-2 be served by way of publication in the daily newspaper "Vir Arjun" (Hindi) Delhi Edition.

CM(M) 1234/2016 1/2

Proof of publication be filed before the next date of hearing. List this matter on the date already fixed i.e., 11-4-2019. RAVINDER SINGH (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MARCH 11, 2019 kr CM(M) 1234/2016 2/2