← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2648/2017

Samir Ahuja v. The State & ORS

2017-07-17Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal2 pages

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2648/2017 SAMIR AHUJA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kamal Khurana, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for State with SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar.

Ms. Divya Jagga, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 17.07.2017 CRL.M.A. 11027/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exception.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2648/2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.271/2013 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC r/w section 3 & 4 of D.P. Act at PS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that a compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties in the matter.

Respondent No. 2 is present in Court today and is identified by the learned counsel and the Investigating Officer. She states that she has settled CRL.M.C. 2648/2017

the matter with the petitioner as per Settlement Agreement dated 04.07.2016. She further states that she has already received the amount of Rs.6,00,000/- in lieu of her Stridhan from the petitioner at the time of granting of Anticipatory Bail vide order dated 24.10.2013. She further states that she has no claim whatsoever remaining against the petitioner and does not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.271/2013 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC r/w section 3 & 4 of D.P. Act at PS Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 17, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 2648/2017